1 |
Rich Freeman <rich0 <at> gentoo.org> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
> > The reason I jumped into this thread is that someone had problems with |
5 |
> > the java project. I'm not sure, but maybe something is wrong with |
6 |
> > my eyes? |
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
Your eyes are fine. Gmane's web interface was hosed. I tried to use |
10 |
nntp (earlybird) but that interface does not consistently respond |
11 |
to the thread, so hacking at the settings and posting(tests) seems |
12 |
to upset some..... |
13 |
|
14 |
I appreciate your ideas, I mostly like the ideas of distributed development |
15 |
for non "core" modules. I also believe and Rich as articulated, that |
16 |
we mostly have thing now. Where I diagree with Rich is this. Sure, |
17 |
If somebody has been a gentoo dev for years, has push access |
18 |
then they can get coding completed. If you are new to the depths |
19 |
of what gentoo devs do, then it is opaque as to which docs to read, |
20 |
dealing with the technical details that are currently used and which |
21 |
are either not documented or poorly documented, etc etc. It's not |
22 |
that any of the devs have a desire to keep folks from becoming deeply |
23 |
capable devs such as themselves, it that these "elites" spend very |
24 |
little time, paving a path for others "fledgling devs"; so the |
25 |
the cost barrier to gaining inside (current) knowledge is very him, |
26 |
imho. Most will just drift to anothe distro where that sort of help |
27 |
is more redily available. Thank god for SVEN. But, he cannot clean |
28 |
up the myriad of docs that need tlc. What you do not seem to "comprehend" |
29 |
Rich, is what most non super_devs want is some help, imho. Just look |
30 |
back at your harsh postings on java. It's rather crushing for folks |
31 |
that want to use Java. Quite simply, I'm developing the skills to |
32 |
use java on gentoo. Those keen developers within the java team, are |
33 |
spread very thin; just look at what they are recruiting for: |
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Gentoo/Staffing_Needs |
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
So I understand that you are not interested in Java. So, how do |
40 |
we find or develop a "gentoo-inner-circle-java-interested" dev? |
41 |
With out that java does not have a chance to gain traction within |
42 |
gentoo, imho. OK, so dont beat me up for being lazy (stupid as |
43 |
volker points out routinely) just *help me* via private email |
44 |
who at Gentoo is the java wizard? I'll do tons of grunt work |
45 |
to make then happy.? OK? |
46 |
|
47 |
Oh shit: problem one. Go clean up BGO's java bugs. I cant because |
48 |
it has become a circular cluster_F!. Too many old blocking bugs; |
49 |
nobody (who gives a shit) with the authority to purge java bugs. |
50 |
|
51 |
|
52 |
|
53 |
> And my point was that the only problem I see with Java is that nobody |
54 |
> is actually working on it. If nobody works on distributed java |
55 |
> repositories, it will be just as bad. |
56 |
|
57 |
Rich, there are billions of Java codes, available in source form |
58 |
that can easily have ebuilds created. But we have poor support |
59 |
for maven, etc. So they go nowhere. (I believe a gentoo-dev for |
60 |
maven is the blocker here. I know that Maven is not easy. I am |
61 |
not (yet) close to being qualified to work on deep maven issues |
62 |
withing gentoo. |
63 |
|
64 |
|
65 |
> My specific request was WHO is trying to do something to improve Java |
66 |
> and finding a policy that is preventing them from doing so, and WHAT |
67 |
> policy is causing the problem? |
68 |
|
69 |
see details above? |
70 |
|
71 |
|
72 |
|
73 |
> It is easy to talk about vague problems. It is harder to actually |
74 |
> pinpoint specific issues that can actually be fixed. |
75 |
> Please don't take this as a personal attack - I generally have a lot |
76 |
> of respect for you. I just don't think that this is a helpful way of |
77 |
> approaching these problems. |
78 |
|
79 |
|
80 |
Ah, I think Hasufell has very good intentions and some keen ideas. |
81 |
My fear is java is getting not love from the gentoo innner circle. |
82 |
So we reduce the innner circle dev count, move java to the perimeter |
83 |
(where nobody cares that is remotely connected to the inner-circle) |
84 |
and java get's better? I've seen this sort of thing thousands of |
85 |
times in my life. Java will just be purged from Gentoo, reticent on |
86 |
your previous postings about your feelings towards Java. |
87 |
|
88 |
|
89 |
Another council member in 2013 was all encouraging about gentoo-clustering. |
90 |
But now that clustering is mostly java centric (imho), few at |
91 |
Gentoo care about cluster on gentoo. Convenient. Sad. Not really |
92 |
encourage to the fledgling community that are willing to work on |
93 |
java, but need leadership. |
94 |
|
95 |
|
96 |
I put (2) ebuilds into BGO. apache-mesos and apache-spark. |
97 |
bugs 510912 and 523412. There they languish. |
98 |
|
99 |
Following the outside overlay semantic guidance, newer versions are here, |
100 |
thanks to Alec: |
101 |
|
102 |
https://github.com/trozamon/overlay/tree/master/sys-cluster |
103 |
|
104 |
So as you point out, go and work on what you want. Really? You think |
105 |
they'll get move to the gentoo tree any time soon? I'm mostly looking |
106 |
for help, encouragement and guidance. I am not looking for harsh |
107 |
reponses that are discouraging. I am not trying to harash you, I appreciate |
108 |
what you do for Gentoo, very much. I get you are not interested in |
109 |
anything remotely connected to java. I would appreciated your keen |
110 |
insight into finding us a java leader that is not burnt to a crisp |
111 |
by the gentoo-stress-burnout syndrome that seems to surging, again. |
112 |
|
113 |
|
114 |
If you want java to prosper at Gentoo, it's gonna take an "inner-circle" |
115 |
gentoo-dev to at least cheerlead for java within gentoo, imho. |
116 |
|
117 |
|
118 |
hth, |
119 |
James |