| 1 |
On 12/1/06, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:19:44 +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > > That's probably because you're running two automounters, which are |
| 5 |
> > > conflicting. You don't need autofs, and probably should not run it, |
| 6 |
> > > when using KDE's system. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > Why should autofs not be running when KDE is used? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Because you'll get exactly the problem the OP mentioned, with two systems |
| 11 |
> trying to control the same device. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> > > The KDE system is also more flexible |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > How do you make use of "media:/" files with normal (ie. non-KDE) |
| 16 |
> > applications? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> They're mounted under /media. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
If I'm thread hijacking, let me know, but it seems related to me: what |
| 22 |
is it that mounts things under /media? I seem to have a couple things |
| 23 |
fighting for devices, none of which obey my udev or fstab rules, |
| 24 |
seemingly. I *think* the contenders are udev (which doesn't mount |
| 25 |
anything, but it's not creating the symlinks I want), |
| 26 |
gnome-volume-manager, hal and pmount (not sure about that last, I'm |
| 27 |
not at my system now.) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Ryan W Sims |
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives