1 |
120904 Peter Humphrey wrote: |
2 |
> On Tuesday 04 September 2012 22:00:48 Neil Bothwick wrote: |
3 |
>> On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 22:31:23 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
4 |
>>> If PORTAGE_TMPDIR fills up no biggy, emerge dies, that's it. |
5 |
>>> But /tmp filled up? Suddenly you will have lots of strange problems. |
6 |
>>> Don't do it. Spare yourself some headaches. |
7 |
>> Good point, maybe I should have mentioned I have a 13GB /tmp. |
8 |
|
9 |
At the moment, after a few hours catching up with the news with FF, |
10 |
my memory usage is : |
11 |
|
12 |
total used free shared buffers cached |
13 |
Mem: 3960 915 3044 0 63 408 |
14 |
-/+ buffers/cache: 443 3516 |
15 |
Swap: 3820 0 3820 |
16 |
|
17 |
Even compiling LO, it doesn't spill into swap anymore. |
18 |
I assume having PORTAGE_TMPDIR on SSD wb noticeably faster than on HDD, |
19 |
but how much faster still would it be to have it in memory ? |
20 |
Memory is cheap & I could buy another 4 GB , it there were a reason. |
21 |
|
22 |
> Also having 16GB RAM I've limited /tmp to 10GB. |
23 |
> I wonder whether 13GB would offer any advantage. |
24 |
> Unlikely, as the only time it gets used in earnest |
25 |
> is when compiling Firefox, OO and the like. |
26 |
> Maybe I should just remove the restriction |
27 |
> and let the kernel optimise its own use of swap and tmpfs. |
28 |
> This box spends well over 90% of its cycles on BOINC projects, |
29 |
> which crunch large numbers of numbers but don't take up a lot of space. |
30 |
|
31 |
What is the best line for /etc/fstab ? The only example I have is : |
32 |
|
33 |
'tmpfs /tmp tmpfs defaults,noatime,mode=1777 0 0' |
34 |
|
35 |
This doesn't seem to limit the size in any way. |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
========================,,============================================ |
39 |
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb |
40 |
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto |
41 |
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca |