1 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2017 12:11:28 -0500, Alan Grimes wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> It appears to be a 2-stage boot process: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> BIOS boot -> Binary of GRUB bootstrap loader. |
7 |
> You don't have a BIOS with a UEFI system. |
8 |
|
9 |
We were discussing BIOS boot on a MFT partition scheme, which is what |
10 |
I'm using right now. |
11 |
|
12 |
> >Boot -> Grub libraries, config, and kernels. |
13 |
> The boot manager in the firmware picks an EFI boot image from the ESP, |
14 |
> usually sda1. Once it loads that it's job is done. The boot image can be |
15 |
> a kernel or a secondary bootloader like GRUB. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Really, there is rarely a point in using GRUB on a UEFI system. Any |
18 |
> bootloader adds extra complication, GRUB does it in spades. Just use a |
19 |
> boot manager like rEFInd or systemd-boot - the latter is the simpler to |
20 |
> work with AFAICT. |
21 |
|
22 |
I would tend to agree with you except I tried booting my kernel with the |
23 |
EFI stub loader by copying it to BOOTx64.EFI (the specification has the |
24 |
X lower case but actual implementations seem to be case insensitive), |
25 |
and the system would lock up. I have no idea what to read into that. The |
26 |
contribution of GRUB is that it makes it easier to change kernel |
27 |
parameters without recompiling the kernel. |
28 |
|
29 |
Damint, my e-mail editor is freezing and not showing my text for several |
30 |
seconds... =( I can type through the pauses but can't read what I'm |
31 |
misspelling during them. =/ |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
Strange Game. |
35 |
The only winning move is not to play. |
36 |
|
37 |
Powers are not rights. |