1 |
You explained it all Rich, thanks. I'm not using it for spam, the idea was |
2 |
to make it easier for me to contact all my students at a time, so I think |
3 |
this is not considered as spamming, but anyway, I'll check for Amazon |
4 |
service see if it can do the job correctly and easily. |
5 |
|
6 |
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:42 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
7 |
|
8 |
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Auto Protection Info |
9 |
> <papezulma@×××××.com> wrote: |
10 |
> >>That looks like a mass mailer. Do you need to send thousands of emails |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > No, but around 2000 emails a day maybe as maximum. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > I managed to configure correctly the relay, does anyone have a suggestion |
15 |
> > for a free SMTP relay service please? |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Best of luck with that, but I'd be shocked if one exists. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Any SMTP relay that can actually get mail delivered to anybody needs |
21 |
> to ensure that their service isn't used to send spam, or they'll |
22 |
> quickly find that they can't get mail delivered to anybody. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> If it is really easy to sign up with no identification and the service |
25 |
> is free/etc, then it is going to be almost impossible to keep spammers |
26 |
> from abusing the service. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> If somebody is offering a free SMTP relay service I'd be surprised if |
29 |
> it has a poor reputation and the reality is that your mail is all |
30 |
> ending up in spam folders, if it gets delivered at all. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> There are tons of services that are relatively inexpensive. They're |
33 |
> all going to make you pay by credit card and such so that it isn't |
34 |
> trivial to just burn through accounts. They'll have a TOS they're |
35 |
> going to hold you to as well. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> I found Amazon SES really easy to set up, and it can work just fine as |
38 |
> an SMTP relay, but with the caveat that they only want you sending |
39 |
> mail "From" your own domains (and they're going to check that you |
40 |
> control those domains). They also have some limits on volume that you |
41 |
> need to contact them to raise. I have no idea what that involves. I |
42 |
> suspect it mostly involves somebody just making sure you seem to run |
43 |
> some kind of legit service. |
44 |
> |
45 |
> Alas, all of this stuff is the price of spam. If somebody delivering |
46 |
> mail doesn't keep their service clear of spam they're going to end up |
47 |
> being blacklisted by the big service providers and they'll quickly go |
48 |
> out of business. And that is why SMTP relay is generally not free. |
49 |
> |
50 |
> As long as you're legit it should be easy to set something up, just |
51 |
> don't expect to do it for free, and obviously don't expect to be able |
52 |
> to use it for spam... |
53 |
> |
54 |
> -- |
55 |
> Rich |
56 |
> |
57 |
> |