1 |
On 12/19/06, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <bss03@××××××××××.net> wrote: |
2 |
> On Tuesday 19 December 2006 13:18, Jakob <jak.gentoo@××××××××××.com> wrote |
3 |
> about '[gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo': |
4 |
> > I have a Core2Duo T5600 1,83 MHz in my notebook. Today I read on the |
5 |
> > GentooWeeklyNewsletter to use "-march=nocona (and an amd64 profile) for |
6 |
> > Core 2 Solo/Duo" |
7 |
> |
8 |
> > 3. They mentiont to use a amd64 profile, does this mean to use 64bit? |
9 |
> > because I would like to stay with 32bit. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Yes. If you want to stick with 32-bit, your settings seem fine, although |
12 |
> there may be a better -march setting available to you. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> -- |
15 |
> "If there's one thing we've established over the years, |
16 |
> it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest |
17 |
> clue what's best for them in terms of package stability." |
18 |
> -- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh |
19 |
> |
20 |
> |
21 |
> |
22 |
Thaks for the quick reply. |
23 |
On http://gentoo-wiki.com/Safe_Cflags they say for 32bit use: |
24 |
CFLAGS="-march=prescott -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer" |
25 |
Is this wat you meant for better -march settings? |
26 |
I was confused by the GWN because they didnt say its for 64bit only. |
27 |
-- |
28 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |