| 1 |
On 4/26/06 1:55 PM, "Teresa and Dale" <teendale@×××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Harald Arnesen wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> "Michael Crute" <mcrute@×××××.com> writes: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>>> I am trying to setup a fax server using Gentoo, I tried using an Intel |
| 10 |
>>> 536ep chipset card with little success. After looking around the |
| 11 |
>>> general consensus seems to be go with US Robotics. Can anyone provide |
| 12 |
>>> the model and manufacture of a fax modem that is known to work with |
| 13 |
>>> both Gentoo any Hylafax? Right now I am running the most recent |
| 14 |
>>> gentoo-sources but I am not opposed to going back to the older 2.4 |
| 15 |
>>> sources. Any help would be greatly appreciated. |
| 16 |
>>> |
| 17 |
>>> |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> Almost any external modem should work. |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> I agree 100%. You do not want a winmodem and a internal hardware modem |
| 24 |
> can be hard to find and sometimes it is hard to get them to tell you if |
| 25 |
> it is a real modem or not. Get a external serial modem and it should |
| 26 |
> work out of the box. This is the same model I used to have, before |
| 27 |
> cable modem showed up, and it faxed and connected to the net real well. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> http://www.magnum-pc.com/ssproduct.asp?pf_id=10240816 |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> You can use that to search for one in your area or even one that may be |
| 32 |
> cheaper. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
I've always hated internal modems for one very good reason. You can't power |
| 35 |
it down without dropping the whole box. Kinda silly reason for a reboot. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives