1 |
Well, after all kinds of tests and trying different types of memory |
2 |
configurations, I can only conclude that my kernel boots normally with 1 GB |
3 |
of RAM installed but hangs when I have 2 GB of RAM installed. I can't find a |
4 |
logical reason for this to happen. |
5 |
|
6 |
Any pointers or suggestions are welcome, |
7 |
Regards |
8 |
|
9 |
On Jan 19, 2008 11:31 PM, José Pedro Saraiva <nocive@×××××.com> wrote: |
10 |
|
11 |
> Following your replies I've done the following, in an attempt to isolate |
12 |
> the problem: |
13 |
> (memory #1 - "old" memory, memory #2 - new memory) |
14 |
> |
15 |
> - Runned memtest on both memories with 0 errors |
16 |
> - Booted with both memories... kernel hang |
17 |
> - Booted with memory #1 on slot #1 successfully |
18 |
> - Booted with memory #1 on slot #2 successfully |
19 |
> - Booted with memory #2 on slot #1 successfully |
20 |
> - Booted with memory #2 on slot #2 successfully |
21 |
> - Booted with both memories on windows successfully |
22 |
> |
23 |
> For some reason, my kernel hangs if I have 2 GB of RAM installed. |
24 |
> And I do have High memory support (4GB), although that doesn't seem |
25 |
> relevant. |
26 |
> Ideas? :X |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Thank you all for the quick replies. |
29 |
> Cheers |
30 |
> |
31 |
> |
32 |
> On Jan 19, 2008 2:29 PM, Hal Martin <hal.martin@×××××.com> wrote: |
33 |
> |
34 |
> > An alternative to running memtest (which is quite easy to do, I might |
35 |
> > add) would be to remove the original RAM and see if the computer boots |
36 |
> > with the new RAM only. |
37 |
> > |
38 |
> > Alternatively, you could just run memtest, as it is included with many |
39 |
> > BIOSs now. It doesn't take long to identify problems, if there are any. |
40 |
> > I find that test #5 is the best test for finding problems, however it |
41 |
> > tends to keep you in the dark until it's finished the test. |
42 |
> > |
43 |
> > |
44 |
> > -Hal |
45 |
> > |
46 |
> > |
47 |
> > Neil Bothwick wrote: |
48 |
> > > On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:58:59 +0000, José Pedro Saraiva wrote: |
49 |
> > > |
50 |
> > > |
51 |
> > >> I'm sure there's nothing wrong with the RAM, |
52 |
> > >> |
53 |
> > > |
54 |
> > > How? Have you run memtest? |
55 |
> > > |
56 |
> > > |
57 |
> > > |
58 |
> > |
59 |
> > -- |
60 |
> > gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
61 |
> > |
62 |
> > |
63 |
> |