1 |
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 3:47 PM William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> As a member of the council, I'll be the first to say I don't know |
4 |
> anything about trustee functions. For me, the question is, do we want to |
5 |
> control our own destiny as an organization or do we want to have another |
6 |
> organization control it in some way? To be honest, I do not have that |
7 |
> answer because I don't know how much control an umbrella organization |
8 |
> would try to exert, and since they would control our purse strings, I |
9 |
> don't know what the scope of control they would be able to exert is. |
10 |
> |
11 |
|
12 |
I certainly share the concern, though I also have concerns about our |
13 |
own sustainability, and I'll note that some of that issue about purse |
14 |
strings also applies with a separate Foundation, simply because the |
15 |
distro are the Foundation are still separate entities, though |
16 |
obviously we have a bit more control over the latter. |
17 |
|
18 |
A lot of this stuff has been discussed on the -nfp and -project lists |
19 |
extensively, so I won't rehash it all. |
20 |
|
21 |
I will touch on one item - the cost of our current accountants. I |
22 |
wouldn't be surprised if it could be done less expensively, however |
23 |
there are a few considerations here: |
24 |
|
25 |
* We had to do a LOT of historical cleanup and so the level of |
26 |
engagement of the accountants for the recent tax filings is probably |
27 |
more than you'd normally expect. |
28 |
|
29 |
* We tend to insist on using FOSS ledger formats which a lot of CPAs |
30 |
probably don't want to deal with. |
31 |
|
32 |
* With the huge compliance issues up until now the main emphasis was |
33 |
getting it done right over getting it done inexpensively. The issues |
34 |
up until now are basically an existential threat, and we're sitting on |
35 |
a lot of cash, so trying to save $1k and potentially losing access to |
36 |
tens of thousands of dollars in the process due to legal issues isn't |
37 |
wise. |
38 |
|
39 |
* After the initial filings were caught up there was some discussion |
40 |
around changing accountants to save money. The thinking is that we |
41 |
wanted to get a bit more traction/experience with getting things done |
42 |
right before we start making changes. The reality is that we have a |
43 |
lot of money right now and while I agree with mgorny's concern that we |
44 |
can't just assume we'll continue to have it, for the short term I |
45 |
think the emphasis should be on figuring out the future state before |
46 |
getting tied up with making the current state more efficient. If the |
47 |
long-term ends up being to keep the Foundation around then of course |
48 |
making it more robust/efficient makes sense. |
49 |
|
50 |
Finally, I'll share a personal opinion that I've already elaborated on |
51 |
elsewhere. I think the best thing we could do to secure our future is |
52 |
to reduce our reliance on having money at all. Plenty of projects get |
53 |
by with nothing more than a github/gitlab/whatever cloud-based repo. |
54 |
Certainly having our infra gives us more options, but it also makes us |
55 |
more dependent on money, and with money comes all the red tape. |
56 |
Aiming for a more cloud-based infra that anybody can clone/fork/etc |
57 |
means that even if github shuts us down somebody just has to create a |
58 |
new repo someplace else and do a push. Commoditizing the infra and |
59 |
investing our efforts into the actual distro seems like the better |
60 |
strategy to be secure. And if we want to host that stuff ourselves |
61 |
that is ok too, but the key is that if somebody takes down our bug |
62 |
tracker we have a dozen devs who are already keeping their own forks |
63 |
of it based on publicly-accessible backups and one just has to make it |
64 |
public to pick up without interruption. |
65 |
|
66 |
Basically we need to think smaller, not bigger. Stuff that involves |
67 |
money should be a nice-to-have, not a must-have. |
68 |
|
69 |
It isn't unlike achieving financial independence/security. The most |
70 |
efficient thing any individual can do to increase their personal |
71 |
financial security is to reduce their recurring spending - you don't |
72 |
need a strategy to generate income that is purely discretionary. |
73 |
|
74 |
-- |
75 |
Rich |