| 1 |
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 04:12:59 -0500, Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Dang. I had to add about 90 packages to my package.use and some more to |
| 4 |
> the keyword file. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I wonder if make.conf would be better in my case too? My use file just |
| 7 |
> grew my a huge amount. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
You package.use has grown by one filesystem block at most, how much extra |
| 10 |
disk space and CPU cycles would you use by compiling 32 bit options for |
| 11 |
every package that has them? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
If you use a single file for package.use, it does make it far more |
| 14 |
cumbersome to manage, but that's why I switched to separate files many |
| 15 |
years ago. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Sigh - An amplifier for people who suffer in silence |
Archives