1 |
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> wrote: |
2 |
> I could get 2 of these for each server, each with a mirrored pair of CF (or |
3 |
> SD) cards (mirror mode is defined by a jumper or switch on the adapter), |
4 |
> then mirror those (in the BIOS), which would result in a total of FOUR CF |
5 |
> (or SD) redundant cards (a mirror of 2 mirrored pairs) for the hypervisor... |
6 |
> and I can do this for quite a bit less than even a SINGLE 146GB SAS drive... |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Is there any reason NOT to do this? |
9 |
> |
10 |
|
11 |
If you have a small ESX cluster, there are numerous advantages to |
12 |
having some local storage on each your ESX hosts in addition to your |
13 |
primary SAN storage: |
14 |
- Testing major ESX version upgrades prior to rolling out to cluster |
15 |
(converting VM's to new hardware format, while leaving old VM's on |
16 |
SAN) |
17 |
- If your setup is too small to have high performance spare SAN |
18 |
devices + storage, what do you do when you have to do a major upgrade |
19 |
of the SAN and/or possibly perform data destructive RAID format |
20 |
changes? iSCSI storage vmotion would allow you to migrate VM's to |
21 |
local storage on ESX servers while SAN is upgraded...several extra |
22 |
hard drives + raid controllers are cheaper than buying another |
23 |
equalogic/emc device. |
24 |
- Some cluster backup software like to replicate backup data outside |
25 |
of the SAN and backup server.....I felt much better when I was |
26 |
performing nightly backups from the SAN to local storage on the ESX |
27 |
boxes and then exporting the dedup'd backup data to backup server for |
28 |
writing to tape. But, there are many ways to resolve this. |
29 |
- Local ESX storage is much cheaper than SAN...there were several |
30 |
cases where I used to run production VM's via SAN, and temporary |
31 |
dev/test VM's on ESX server local storage |
32 |
- Lastly, I never really have been a fan of ESXi as an upgrade from |
33 |
ESX.....seems that it was more driven by vmware making windows admins |
34 |
feel more confident since they didn't have to learn linux for ESX |
35 |
console. |
36 |
|
37 |
But, there is nothing keeping you from getting mirrored CF/SD cards |
38 |
for the hypervisor boot and also keeping a few mirrored 2TB SATA |
39 |
drives on each host for local datastores (7200rpm SATA is much cheaper |
40 |
than 15K rpm SAS). |
41 |
|
42 |
Of course, for large ESX clusters, you can probably afford numerous |
43 |
SAN devices which would negate most of the above. |
44 |
|
45 |
Matt |