| 1 |
Am 02.10.2009 10:52, schrieb forgottenwizard: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 09:07:20AM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 19:34:25 -0500, forgottenwizard wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>>> So instead it should set a non-existant editor to the configured |
| 6 |
>>> default? |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Nano is not non-existent by default. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> It isn't always on the users sytem. Providing a non-existent default |
| 12 |
> seems quite broken to me. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
By DEFAULT it is on EVERY Gentoo-system. |
| 15 |
If you CHOOSE to remove the default then you have to be prepared that |
| 16 |
something may be broken after that. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
You could never be certain that anything set as default is existent on |
| 19 |
the system. Even if a distro would remove the possibility to uninstall |
| 20 |
the default with the help of the package manager so is there always rm |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
So every default could be a non-existent default. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Greetings |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Sebastian |
Archives