1 |
On Tuesday 31 May 2011 20:55:08 Mark Knecht wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> |
3 |
wrote: |
4 |
> > On 2011-05-31 1:31 PM, James wrote: |
5 |
> >> The only thing I've read online that may be applicable is that there |
6 |
> >> have been some issues with kernel panics when you give the guest OS |
7 |
> >> more than 1 processor. It would suck badly if SMP didn't work well on |
8 |
> >> vbox. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > My understanding is it is a general rule that you never give any VM more |
11 |
> > than one processor, regardless of which vm hypervisor you are running... |
12 |
> |
13 |
> My platform is a Gentoo i7-980 Extreme processor so I have 12 CPUs (6 |
14 |
> cores * 2 for hyperthreading) |
15 |
> |
16 |
> In Virtualbox I'm running both Gentoo and Win 7 VMs, each allocated 4 |
17 |
> processors. In Win 7 I have one app that uses everything it can find |
18 |
> so when it's running all 4 processors are 100% utilized. In Linux I |
19 |
> see the CPU usage at 33%. Win 7 is sluggish when this app is running |
20 |
> as it hogs from the system |
21 |
> |
22 |
> In VMWare Player I'm running Win XP VMs with 2 processors. None of my |
23 |
> apps in XP use more than 1 processor. XP itself is quite responsive |
24 |
> even when these apps are using 1 of the 2 processors dedicated the the |
25 |
> VM. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> I seldom run more than 1 app in any Windows VM as I don't trust |
28 |
> Windows. I've not had any problems with any of these VMs that I'd |
29 |
> associate with using multiple cores. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> And yes, I do own these Windows licenses. VMs keep that money useful |
32 |
> until some day some Linux apps come along that do what these do for me |
33 |
> in Windows. |
34 |
|
35 |
A bit OT I guess, but what apps are you using that do not have a Linux |
36 |
alternative Mark? Answer off list if you wish so we do not hijack the thread. |
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
Regards, |
40 |
Mick |