| 1 |
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann |
| 2 |
<volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Donnerstag 24 September 2009, Marco wrote: |
| 4 |
>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 7 |
>> > On Donnerstag 24 September 2009, Marco wrote: |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> [...] |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> > just install the qt4 set. Meta packages are being phased out. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> Not sure if I understand what you mean. I thought sets only exist for |
| 14 |
>> world and system? |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> > Or unmask the meta package. /etc/portage/package.unmask. |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> That's what I want to avoid since apparently this meta package gets |
| 19 |
>> removed in the future. |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
>> -- |
| 22 |
>> Regards, |
| 23 |
>> Marco |
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> so what? it really does not matter if it is there or not. And no - with 2.2* |
| 27 |
> portage there are many more sets than just world and system. You can even |
| 28 |
> easily create your own. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Well, I try to avoid installing such packages to not have migration |
| 31 |
issues later. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
And, yes, portage 2.2* apparently supports many more sets, but portage |
| 34 |
2.2* is still masked and I don't know if there is a potental risk to |
| 35 |
use it already. |
Archives