Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Michael Orlitzky <michael@××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Installing specific layman packages & eix-test-obsolete
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 21:49:06
Message-Id: 50C506AF.1040904@orlitzky.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Installing specific layman packages & eix-test-obsolete by Grant
1 On 12/09/2012 04:01 PM, Grant wrote:
2 >
3 > If my package.mask is empty, eix-test-obsolete runs fine. If I have
4 > this in package.mask:
5 >
6 > */*::init6
7 >
8 > eix-test-obsolete find over 27,000 packages under this heading:
9 >
10 > Redundant in /etc/portage/package.mask:
11 > ... considered as REDUNDANT_IF_MASK_NO_CHANGE
12 >
13 > Adding the following to package.nowarn doesn't seem to change anything:
14 >
15 > */*::init6 mask_no_change
16 >
17 > The first of the 27,000 packages is app-accessibility/SphinxTrain which
18 > is in the portage tree and not in an overlay.
19 >
20
21 Try a hammer:
22
23 */*::init6 in_keywords no_change double mixed weaker double_line
24 in_mask mask_no_change double_masked in_unmask unmask_no_change
25 double_unmasked in_use double_use in_env double_env in_license
26 double_license in_cflags double_cflags nonexistent masked
27 other_overlay
28
29 With nothing in package.nowarn, I get 700-some REDUNDANT_IF_NO_CHANGE
30 warnings. If I add just,
31
32 */*::gentoo-haskell no_change
33
34 I get output that looks almost exactly like the REDUNDANT_IF_NO_CHANGE
35 warnings, but if I look closely, it's for in-keywords-but-not-installed.
36 In other words, that single nowarn entry may be working, but you might
37 be getting some other warning now.
38
39 If adding them all to package.nowarn makes the warnings go away, then
40 you just have to figure out which subset you need.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Installing specific layman packages & eix-test-obsolete Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com>