Archives
Archives
| From: | Adam Carter <adamcarter3@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Fast file system for cache directory with lot's of files | ||
| Date: | Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:10:16 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAC=wYCGqhat5-E96X2a_GoSJGN0bT+vGVoKTsQayV7HPTp-h1A@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Fast file system for cache directory with lot's of files by Paul Hartman |
||
| 1 | > I think btrfs probably is meant to provide a lot of the modern |
| 2 | > features like reiser4 or xfs |
| 3 | |
| 4 | Unfortunately btrfs is still generally slower than ext4 for example. |
| 5 | Checkout http://openbenchmarking.org/, eg |
| 6 | http://openbenchmarking.org/s/ext4%20btrfs |
| 7 | |
| 8 | The OS will use any spare RAM for disk caching, so if there's not much |
| 9 | else running on that box, most of your content will be served from |
| 10 | RAM. It may be that whatever fs you choose wont make that much of a |
| 11 | difference anyways. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Fast file system for cache directory with lot's of files | Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@××××××××××××××××.de> |