| 1 |
On 2011-09-18 14:32, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> So you are going from a single bug to 'it must be evil'. If you do that all |
| 4 |
> the time there isn't much software left. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
You said: "I bet you can't even measure a |
| 7 |
difference between dbus running and dbus not running in speed or |
| 8 |
responsiveness of your gui." |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I only pointed out that that was not always correct (I don't run |
| 11 |
Ubuntu). And I have had a _lot_ of problems with dbus (again, this was |
| 12 |
years ago, running binary distros - it's only recently that I had dbus |
| 13 |
installed again due to Xfce4 requiring it); if I get burnt by some piece |
| 14 |
of software (usually it's gnome/freedesktop related - seems a lot of bad |
| 15 |
ideas/implementations come from that "place") I try to go "elsewhere". |
| 16 |
So if your experience with dbus is different, then fine, by all means |
| 17 |
use it; it is your choice. But I choose to avoid it, if possible. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
And yes, it seems no matter how hard I try the "gnome" paradigm ('evil' |
| 20 |
software) seems to be inching ever closer... I think developers, in |
| 21 |
general, should take some hints from this guy: |
| 22 |
http://www.sics.se/~adam/ |
| 23 |
... he created this: |
| 24 |
http://www.contiki-os.org/p/about-contiki.html |
| 25 |
... running this: |
| 26 |
http://www.c64web.com/ |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Best regards |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Peter k |
Archives