| 1 |
On 2008-08-10, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>>> Is there a Linux system somewhere with a *non-GNU* userland? |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> What do you mean by "non-Gnu"? |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> SW for which the FSF doesn't own the copyrights? |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> SW which is distributed under something other than one of the |
| 10 |
>> Gnu Public Licenses? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Software that does not belong to the GNU project. The GNU |
| 13 |
> project is a fixed and well defined set of software. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
It would then help if you could point us to that definition? |
| 16 |
Answering a question about your terminology with "my term is |
| 17 |
well defined" isn't very helpful. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
>> The last time I did a basic FreeBSD install, it included Gnu |
| 20 |
>> user-land stuff (e.g. gcc). |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Anything else besides GCC? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I can't think of anything else off the top of my head, but it's |
| 25 |
been a couple years since I've had a FreeBSD system. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Grant Edwards grante Yow! I'm sitting on my |
| 29 |
at SPEED QUEEN ... To me, |
| 30 |
visi.com it's ENJOYABLE ... I'm WARM |
| 31 |
... I'm VIBRATORY ... |
Archives