1 |
On 2/5/2009 7:01 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> no. He is an idiot if he does not read the docs. Simple. Like people who don't |
4 |
> read the manual to their car or vcr and then complaining if something does not |
5 |
> work. Idiots. |
6 |
|
7 |
"They should read the manual" is *not* a valid design goal for a system. |
8 |
At best, it's a justification or rationalization when outside |
9 |
constraints force a design to be non-intuitive. |
10 |
|
11 |
Given the choice between two otherwise equally functional systems (of |
12 |
any sort -- electronic, mechanical, digital, etc); if one requires me to |
13 |
spend extensive time reading an instruction manual to use and the other |
14 |
is designed to be easy to use out of the box -- the "idiot" is the |
15 |
person wasting their time reading instead of being productive. To use |
16 |
your own example, I have no problem figuring out how to start my car, |
17 |
turn on the A/C, tune my radio, and drive to work without reading the |
18 |
automobile manual. |
19 |
|
20 |
If Gentoo's installer *has* to be difficult because it's the only way to |
21 |
supply additional benefits or features, that's a perfectly reasonable |
22 |
argument. If Gentoo's installer is *stuck* being difficult because |
23 |
there is a lack of resources interested in making it better, that's an |
24 |
upsetting, but equally reasonable argument. |
25 |
|
26 |
If Gentoo's installer is difficult *on purpose* just to make Gentoo hard |
27 |
to use, that's ridiculous. |
28 |
|
29 |
--K |