1 |
On 04/05/11 19:53, KH wrote: |
2 |
> Am 05.04.2011 11:46, schrieb Jake Moe: |
3 |
>> On 04/05/11 18:14, KH wrote: |
4 |
>>> Am 04.04.2011 21:30, schrieb Peter Humphrey: |
5 |
>>>> On Monday 04 April 2011 19:12:03 William Kenworthy wrote: |
6 |
>>>> |
7 |
>>>>> I dont think http-replicator can manage a directory structure - are you |
8 |
>>>>> trying to do something fancier than just serving out tarballs? |
9 |
>>>> Yes; I want it to mirror my portage tree and serve it to other boxes on the LAN. |
10 |
>>>> It used to do this well enough; I just want to get the permissions right. |
11 |
>>> Hi, |
12 |
>>> |
13 |
>>> why not using the handbook-way? |
14 |
>>> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/rsync.xml#doc_chap2 |
15 |
>>> I am doing it that way. |
16 |
>>> |
17 |
>>> Regards KH |
18 |
>> +1 |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> I've got four boxes in my home network, and I have one pull down the |
21 |
>> updates, the other three sync with that one. |
22 |
>> |
23 |
>> I've also set up proftpd to allow anonymous read-only access to my |
24 |
>> /usr/portage/distfiles folder, so the other three can try to pull their |
25 |
>> packages from locally first as well, and if that box hasn't downloaded |
26 |
>> it yet, only then will they try to retrieve it from the Internet. See |
27 |
>> http://www.gentoo-wiki.info/HOWTO_Setup_local_Portage_and_Package_Mirror |
28 |
>> for info. |
29 |
>> |
30 |
>> Jake Moe |
31 |
> Hi Jake Moe, |
32 |
> |
33 |
> for the distfiles http-replicator is great. Example: |
34 |
> Box one has the tarball. Box 2, 3 and 4 can download it as well. Box one |
35 |
> does not have the tarball. Box 2 may search for it, box one will |
36 |
> download it and give it to box 2. Then box 3 and 4 can download it from |
37 |
> box one as well. |
38 |
> |
39 |
> Regards KH |
40 |
Well, I suppose I'll have to look into that then, won't I? Thanks for |
41 |
the info. |
42 |
|
43 |
Jake Moe |