1 |
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de> wrote: |
2 |
> On 01/03/2011 10:23 PM, Paul Hartman wrote: |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Nikos Chantziaras<realnc@×××××.de> wrote: |
5 |
>>> |
6 |
>>> uvesafb will not give you extra resolutions. It will however allow you |
7 |
>>> to |
8 |
>>> use non-default refresh-rates which is sometimes useful with CRT |
9 |
>>> monitors. |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>>> But it has a drawback too: it needs a userspace tool and resolution is |
12 |
>>> switched too late during the boot process, meaning until it loads you'll |
13 |
>>> be |
14 |
>>> seeing the kernel boot in 80x25 mode (which in turn means no boot |
15 |
>>> graphics/logo right from the start.) |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> I use uvesafb and I can see Tux (eight of him) during my boot process |
18 |
>> before uvesafb kicks in. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> I mean more something like this when I say "boot logo": |
21 |
> |
22 |
> http://mjanusz.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/shot.png |
23 |
> |
24 |
> It's at least 10 years since I saw that default Tux boot thingy :-P But |
25 |
> anyway, if uvesafb hasn't kicked in yet, what on earth is drawing that Tux? |
26 |
|
27 |
Ah-ha, I think that's bootsplash (which I'm not using). I've only |
28 |
seen it on a Live CD. :) |
29 |
|
30 |
In my kernel config I have enabled VESA framebuffer as well as |
31 |
userspace framebuffer (uvesafb), and I enabled "Bootup Logo". So maybe |
32 |
what happens is that VESA framebuffer starts immediately into some |
33 |
default resolution, I see eight Tuxs (Tuxes?), then shortly thereafter |
34 |
the uvesafb kicks in and video mode changes to the one I specified. At |
35 |
least that's how it seems to happen. I reboot so rarely that I never |
36 |
gave it much thought. |