Archives
Archives
| From: | "b.n." <brullonulla@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] utempter vs libutempter | ||
| Date: | Sat, 03 Jun 2006 16:15:31 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4481D4E7.4010103@gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] utempter vs libutempter by Allan Gottlieb |
||
| 1 | > I would think that the idea is that merging B (which is new or |
| 2 | > updated) changed the system so that A can now be remerged. For |
| 3 | > example perhaps the updated B has changed DEPEND and/or PROVIDE. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | This makes sense (despite 1.5 years of Gentoo I still don't get all |
| 6 | subtle Portage features...my fault). Thanks! |
| 7 | |
| 8 | m. |
| 9 | -- |
| 10 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] utempter vs libutempter | Teresa and Dale <teendale@×××××××××××××.com> |