| 1 |
Am 12.04.2012 22:16, schrieb Michael Mol: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On 12/04/12 22:49, Dale wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> Howdy, |
| 6 |
>>>> |
| 7 |
>>>> Well, it appears we got the init thingy working. I'm about ready to |
| 8 |
>>>> move things around since one of my drives is about full and I need a |
| 9 |
>>>> spare to move things around with. |
| 10 |
>>>> |
| 11 |
[...] |
| 12 |
>>>> |
| 13 |
>>>> Anything else that could be a gotcha? I plan to move this twice. Once |
| 14 |
>>>> to the spare drive, repartition the OS drive then copy things back over |
| 15 |
>>>> again. It's been a while and with LVM about to be used, I hope it is |
| 16 |
>>>> the last time. |
| 17 |
>>> |
| 18 |
>>> Make sure this is really what you want. If *any* of the disks in the |
| 19 |
>>> LVM goes bad, you lose everything, not just the data on that single disk. |
| 20 |
>>> |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
>> < dale goes to figure out a way around this one. > |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
>> Thanks for that. I hadn't thought about that. If I tie two drives |
| 25 |
>> together, the file system spans both drives. One dies, the whole thing |
| 26 |
>> is broken as you say. Makes sense. |
| 27 |
>> |
| 28 |
>> < scratches chin > I think I can still make this work tho. Yea, I got |
| 29 |
>> a idea. It wasn't my original plan but this should work. Sure glad you |
| 30 |
>> mentioned that though. THANKS MUCH !!! |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> This is why I do LVM on top of a RAID device. |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Or if you are short on disk space, you can also use LVM to mirror just |
| 36 |
/home. |
Archives