1 |
Walter Dnes wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 08:24:03AM -0500, Dale wrote |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Questions. Can a virus infect the OS when running on Linux through |
5 |
>> java/javascript/flash? |
6 |
> There are two levels of "infection"... |
7 |
> |
8 |
> 1) One-off execution of bad stuff when you visit a web page. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> 2) A more permanent infection that survives restarting the web browser, |
11 |
> and rebooting the machine. But that would need to be linux executable. |
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
OK. I do banking online. I also pay my bills online along with social |
15 |
sites as well. I use Lastpass so that I can have some really REALLY |
16 |
funky passwords. I think I am one of few that has not had his facebook |
17 |
hacked. Anyway, I run Gentoo which is known here. I use |
18 |
Firefox/Seamonkey as my web browser. So next question sort of takes us |
19 |
back to my point with the knucklehead in the store. Am I safer, much |
20 |
safer, using Linux over windoze? That answer would take into account |
21 |
the fact that most virus/nasty code is written for windoze and not Linux |
22 |
but also that Linux is just built with security in mind. I belive that |
23 |
I am much safer with Linux myself. Just a rough example of what some |
24 |
passwords look like for me: |
25 |
|
26 |
5u9YU7335cb29hPE |
27 |
|
28 |
I don't actually use that as a password so no need in some script kiddy |
29 |
trying it. LOL |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
>> Or would the infection at the least be limited to that user? |
33 |
> Usually, unless they find a privilege escalation hole. Then again, |
34 |
> it's the user-info (bank login and password, credit card number, etc) |
35 |
> that's really profitable for organized crime. |
36 |
|
37 |
I can certainly agree with that. I have a few people that use windoze |
38 |
and refuse to even think about ordering online, banking or anything that |
39 |
requires financial type info. If they are not going to keep their stuff |
40 |
up to date, may be a good idea. These are the same folks that don't |
41 |
update anti-virus and such too. :/ |
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
> |
45 |
>> How is html5 going to affect this? Better or worse? |
46 |
> If/when it results in the end of Flash, that's an improvement. The |
47 |
> thing I worry about is that anything "powerful enough" can be (ab)used. |
48 |
> |
49 |
|
50 |
I was hoping if they was going to all the trouble on creating this that |
51 |
it was going to do some sort of good and improve security. I don't mean |
52 |
just for Linux folks either. For the record, I use https everywhere and |
53 |
I think I have a similar thing for html5 too. I know I opted in for |
54 |
youtube. |
55 |
|
56 |
Thanks for the answers. I think you see where I am going with this. I |
57 |
still laugh when I think about what that guy said tho. |
58 |
|
59 |
Dale |
60 |
|
61 |
:-) :-) |
62 |
|
63 |
-- |
64 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |