Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Derek Tracy <tracyde@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path?
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 22:50:54
Message-Id: 9999810b0511161437l2b168ce4m8ffce3b7ccf2f202@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path? by Richard Fish
1 On 11/16/05, Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org> wrote:
2 >
3 > On 11/16/05, Derek Tracy <tracyde@×××××.com> wrote:
4 > > When a branch is marked stable all of the packages in that branch should
5 > > work,
6 >
7 > I'm not sure this is always possible. Much of your complaint comes
8 > from the ipw2200 driver, which is new in 2.6.14. But the in-kernel
9 > version is several versions older than the external driver. So should
10 > 2.6.14 remain marked as unstable because of this one driver that works
11 > for some people, but not for others? Or because a specific externally
12 > maintained driver or package doesn't build against it?
13 >
14 > On my system, either the in-kernel or external drivers work fine. The
15 > only caveat is that I need firmware version 2.2 with the in-kernel
16 > drivers, and a different version for the external. If I am using the
17 > external version, the portage dependancy tree makes sure I have the
18 > right version of the firmware. But the kernel sources do not (and
19 > should not) depend upon the ipw2200-firmware package, so this is a
20 > case where I need to know the driver requirements. (Also, the kernel
21 > help specifies that the driver requires external firmware, although it
22 > doesn't specify what version.)
23
24
25 What I am complaining about is that neither of the drivers will work.
26
27 Regarding the X.org <http://X.org> issue, without an Xorg.0.log file, it is
28 > really
29 > impossible to say what the problem there is. It could be something as
30 > simple as your kernel configuration; for example leaving out I2C or
31 > AGP support could cause this.
32 >
33 > But in my view, you cannot take an existing xorg.conf file and expect
34 > it to work without any issues _without_ duplicating the same system
35 > configuration (kernel version, kernel config, and nvidia driver
36 > version). The fastest method of configuring X on a new system is to
37 > run "X -configure", test the resulting configuration, and use that
38 > xorg.conf file. Yes, this would use the opensource x.org <http://x.org> Nv
39 > driver,
40 > but it should definitely work for getting X up and running. If this
41 > doesn't work, then you have reason to complain.
42
43
44 I have tried both ways. My reasoning for taking my old config was originally
45 for the Modeline info. The only reason that I arbitrarily threw it into the
46 newly built system was because the X -configure did not work (even after I
47 switched the dev/mouse to /dev/input/mice) I get the same error with both of
48 the configs.
49
50 If the proprietary nvidia driver doesn't work with a particular kernel
51 > version, you can only complain to nvidia.
52
53
54 I have had that happen in the past and would not ever think about blaming
55 the Gentoo Developers for NVidias work.
56
57 I'm quite sure a binary-based distribution would have worked better
58 > for you in this case, only because nothing would have been upgraded or
59 > changed. Everything that worked before would have continued to work,
60 > just like everything that was broken before would have continued to be
61 > broken. It is the price of progress, IMO.
62 >
63 > -Richard
64 >
65 > --
66 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
67 >
68 >
69
70
71 --
72 ---------------------------------
73 Derek Tracy
74 tracyde@×××××.com
75 ---------------------------------

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path? Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org>