| 1 |
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 2 |
> [...] |
| 3 |
> The reason is that KDE4 is a new product and has nothing to do with KDE3 |
| 4 |
> other than the name. And another reason is the problem I'm describing |
| 5 |
> in this very thread which should have not been a problem if KDE4 had its |
| 6 |
> own tree. Now I'm required to have non-straightforward voodoo performed |
| 7 |
> to get things right just because the devs made a wrong decision. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Another problem, this time not technical. I just don't want many of |
| 10 |
those packages in my world file. I want to use depclean and have those |
| 11 |
packages removed when the package that depends on them is also removed. |
| 12 |
The depclean feature just got useless for those packages. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Anyone still thinks it was a good idea to have KDE4 use the same tree |
| 15 |
with KDE3? This is was clearly a wrong decision. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Workarounds are welcome. |
Archives