| 1 |
On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 13:49:48 -0700 Steve Dibb <beandog@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Andrey Gerasimenko wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Looking at the Portage tree, I see that some packages are kept ~x86 |
| 5 |
> > for long time without any bugs referenced in the changelog or |
| 6 |
> > Bugzilla. How are they being made stable (or where in the docs is the |
| 7 |
> > process described)? |
| 8 |
> They need to be in the tree for at least 30 days, no bugs, and if |
| 9 |
> someone files a stable request ebuild, then an arch tester will test it, |
| 10 |
> and then a dev will keyword it stable. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Most stuff doesnt get marked stable mostly because there aren't any |
| 13 |
> stable requests. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Stabilisation bug it not a requirement. Package should go to stable |
| 16 |
after 30 days + no bugs even without stabilization bug. I have an |
| 17 |
impresion that developers are _waiting_ for stabilization bugs which |
| 18 |
is wrong. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I've raised a similar question few months ago. It's pretty long |
| 21 |
discussion on -user and -dev: |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/166565/ |
| 24 |
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/40719/ |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Robert |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Robert Cernansky |
| 31 |
E-mail: hslists2@××××××.sk |
| 32 |
Jabber: HS@××××××.sk |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives