1 |
On Monday 09 October 2006 22:48, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: |
2 |
> On Monday 09 October 2006 09:07, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote |
3 |
> |
4 |
> about '[gentoo-user] [OT] RSA Vs DSA keys for SSH authentication': |
5 |
> > Some say that RSA is |
6 |
> > widely considered more secure than DSA. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> DSA is mathematically stronger than RSA. However, that doesn't mean much |
9 |
> since most attacks don't come from attacking the core of the algorithm |
10 |
> anyway. |
11 |
|
12 |
Do you mean that an RSA key with twice the number of bits (e.g. 2048 or even |
13 |
higher) is still weaker (i.e. easier to crack) than the DSA key? I know it's |
14 |
all psychological, but in my paranoid state it'll make me feel |
15 |
better . . . :)) |
16 |
-- |
17 |
Regards, |
18 |
Mick |