Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Jack <ostroffjh@×××××××××××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Council vs Umbrella Corp ?
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:42:33
Message-Id: 1b4fec9e-01ca-46b4-1609-134b626952cb@users.sourceforge.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Council vs Umbrella Corp ? by james
1 On 8/28/20 12:33 PM, james wrote:
2 > On 8/27/20 10:11 PM, Dale wrote:
3 >> james wrote:
4 >>> Gentoo,
5 >>>
6 >>>
7 >>>
8 >>> https://blogs.gentoo.org/mgorny/2020/08/25/is-an-umbrella-organization-a-good-choice-for-gentoo/
9 >>>
10 >>>
11 >>>
12 >>> Surely some of the business/legal savvy folks want to "chime in" on
13 >>> Sir Gorny's proposal?
14 >>>
15 >>>
16 >>> I just read this on 'hacker news'
17 >>>
18 >>> It just sounds like mostly a lack of fund raising to operate?
19 >>>
20 >>>
21 >>> James
22 >>>
23 >>>
24 >>
25 >>
26 >> There's several issues that lead to this.� For ages, the financial
27 >> books were not kept up to date.� From what I recall, some paperwork
28 >> was lost which made it difficult to impossible to do the needed IRS
29 >> filings.  Things on that part seemed to snowball from there.� In
30 >> the past few years or so, that has been dealt with and from what I've
31 >> read, it is now up to date and they are trying to get back in good
32 >> standing with the IRS and other Govt entities.� I think I read
33 >> where most of the hard work as already been done, just needs time to
34 >> kick in.� It isn't hard to get into that situation, it just takes
35 >> one year with a mistake to trigger bad things.� It takes a lot of
36 >> work to get it cleared up tho.� All of us should be grateful to the
37 >> ones who put in the hard work to get that taken care of.� I'm sure
38 >> it took a lot of effort and time to get that done.� I'm sure it was
39 >> boring as heck to do as well.� Some of us would likely have no hair
40 >> left.
41 >>
42 >> Another issue, not many want to run the foundation.� The devs
43 >> mostly want to write code.� They aren't to much interested in
44 >> running the foundation part of it.� A few do because it is needed
45 >> and they do their best, some even go far beyond that, but they really
46 >> want to write code.  That's what developers came to Gentoo for after
47 >> all. Since there is two different bodies that run Gentoo in different
48 >> ways, it further reduces the number of people wanting to do the
49 >> job.� The foundation part is from my understanding, bureaucratic
50 >> paperwork.� Who wants to do that for free?� There's not many.
51 >> Basically, if you run for a position on the foundation, it's good
52 >> odds you get it because usually just enough run to fill the open
53 >> spots.� I often wonder, do they draw straws to pick people to run
54 >> just so things keep chugging along??� LOL
55 >>
56 >> Then there is the costs.� It costs to deal with all the paperwork
57 >> and filings.� There's state filings as well as federal.� Missing
58 >> either of those can cause trouble for the other and also get
59 >> expensive and time consuming to correct.� Again, very few want to
60 >> deal with it.� The few that do likely do it because Gentoo needs it
61 >> not because they are jumping up and down wanting to do it.� It's
62 >> what keeps Gentoo going. It's cheaper to join some other group like
63 >> has been talked about for years and let them take a percentage of the
64 >> money and them as professionals handle all that nasty paperwork and
65 >> filings.
66 >>
67 >> My personal opinion.� I'm still leaning to keep Gentoo as it is but
68 >> I'm not the one doing all the boring work either.� My concern,
69 >> Gentoo joins some group and it ends badly for Gentoo.� Maybe they
70 >> screw up something and that puts Gentoo and maybe everyone else in
71 >> the group in jeopardy with govt entities or lawsuits.� On the other
72 >> hand, if Gentoo doesn't have the right people, they could do the same
73 >> thing to themselves.� The people who do run for those seats do try
74 >> their best even if something goes wrong.� Thing is, it doesn't take
75 >> much to run afoul of govt entities or trigger a lawsuit. Gentoo has
76 >> been lucky in that regard.  There is no easy answer to this.�
77 >> Either way has advantages.� Same can be said for disadvantages as
78 >> well.
79 >>
80 >> I'm sure there is more that isn't known to the public and I'm sure
81 >> some things are escaping my mind at the moment.� Either way,
82 >> whatever keeps Gentoo going and successful, that is what needs to be
83 >> done.� Since I don't have a crystal ball, I'm not sure which is
84 >> best long term.
85 >>
86 >> Now someone add more to this.� ;-)
87 >>
88 >> Dale
89 >>
90 >> :-)� :-)
91 >
92 > The referenced article says this:
93 >
94 > "Right now we�re already relying on a CPA to handle our filings. For
95 > a commercial company (we are one now), the cost is $1500 a year."
96 >
97 > Seems way too high. I pay $500/yr for a C corp here in Florida; a firm
98 > that that is "outstanding" with the US IRS.
99 >
100 >
101 > "If we wanted to go for proper non-profit, the estimated cost is
102 > between $2000 and $3000 a year."
103 >
104 >
105 > Still seems way to high. With Gentoo, we can use Any state, so why not
106 > move the home to a low cost state?
107 >
108 > Many corps use Delaware, just for that reason.
109 I think most of those listed numbers are not just the official filing
110 fees, but include paying a CPA to do the filings.  While certified CPA
111 is not required to do any of those filings, I suspect it is now that way
112 because historically, the volunteer who was supposed to do it didn't. 
113 Paying someone does seem excessively expensive, but you know it will get
114 done, and if not, you have some legal recourse.
115 >
116 >
117 > "If we were to pass full accounting to an external company, the rough
118 > estimate I�ve been given by Trustees is $2400. So once our volunteer
119 > bookkeeper retires, we�re talking of around $4000 + larger taxes for
120 > a corporation, or $4500 to $5500 + very little taxes for a non-profit."
121 >
122 >
123 > Again, these numbers are WAY TOO HIGH. Shop around!
124 > Many states are way less expensive.
125 Again, I think those numbers are to pay someone to handle the filings,
126 not just the fees.  I don't suppose it really changes much about the
127 discussion.
128 >
129 >
130 > Ok so ask why don't I volunteer? I've been using gentoo, since 2002. I
131 > have made many enemies, because of my views on the whole "install"
132 > abortion. WE could easily help another loosely coupled, gentoo
133 > derivative distro
134 > create a robust, easy install system, whilst leaving "Gentoo Proper"
135 > as an enclave for the brilliant.
136 >
137 > It there were agreement to that sort "diatribe", enthusiastically,
138 > THEN I could help the trustee situation, and help bring in lots of
139 > cash to pay devs for what every reason the technical leaders decide.
140 >
141 > CoreOS, gentoo-install (Mike Mol), CloverOS, and dozens and dozens
142 > (over the years) have solved this problem, bot did not receive any
143 > love or praise from the Gentoo devs......
144 >
145 >
146 > So, if Gentoo wants money, as a charity, it is so simple, it hurts.
147 > BUT a few things have to change (non-negotiable)!
148 >
149 >
150 > I've done this too many times with dozens of folks. ALL are
151 > multi-millionaires. MONEY is easy, but it does come with strings
152 > (actually very few for something like gentoo).  The current situation
153 > is pathetic and easy to fix. Be warned, when it comes to money, and I
154 > am on the responsibility chain, I tend to be a bit dictatorial. Once
155 > the money starts flowing in, I'd look to hand things off to a much
156 > younger techie, so he(she) can build there resume and I can drift back
157 > into oblivion,
158 > in a cabin, in the woods.......
159 >
160 >
161 > For me, it just breaks my heart to see Gentoo needed to have one of
162 > our (currently) awesome coders have to "prostrate" himself publicly
163 > like this. But, if a broken system/leadership is broken, then that is
164 > the sign things need to change. This has been a recurring situation,
165 > for 2 decades now. Just look around, most other distros have so much
166 > 'action' going on, they are rolling in cabbage.
167 >
168 > Perhaps the Gentoo council members ought to engage the gentoo-user
169 > list, directly? Surely others would have solution, very viable, to
170 > what I have proposed?
171 >
172 > The second thing I'd do, if on the council, is have a direct program
173 > for High School age kids to use Gentoo to become entrepreneurs. That's
174 > right, how to form a C-corp, write some codes and start receiving
175 > funds directly into their C-corp. Minimum goal? Self Funding for
176 > Secondary education. Learn Business via gentoo, and coding "from the
177 > masters" aka gentoo devs.
178 >
179 > There are tons of methods for young entrepreneurs to access funding
180 > and grants, if you "get your house in order". For that, it means a
181 > simple Rasp. Pi. 4 sourcecode install? The microprocessor companies
182 > would line up to build boards, for these kids. EASY as PIE!
183 >
184 > Be Bold and Be Bad_ass, if you want to live and prosper in this day
185 > and age.
186 >
187 >
188 > painfully,
189 > James
190 >
191 >

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Council vs Umbrella Corp ? Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>