Archives
Archives
| From: | Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What is up with the libreoffice ebuild? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 06 Sep 2011 21:26:04 | ||
| Message-Id: | CA+czFiDHLdUBhUQJ2NpCy_bR_a8w+AXoS3M+shmNSFysDbP+rA@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Re: What is up with the libreoffice ebuild? by Grant Edwards |
||
| 1 | On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 | > On 2011-09-06, Canek Pel??ez Vald??s <caneko@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 | > As for cups being "huge", the standard install comprises over 500 |
| 4 | > files. That's still huge in my book. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Most of those are going to be ppd files, right? File a bug asking for |
| 7 | 'use' flags, or an ebuild split, or some other mechanism to only |
| 8 | install a subset of those. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | :wq |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What is up with the libreoffice ebuild? | "Canek Peláez Valdés" <caneko@×××××.com> |