| 1 |
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 01:48:05PM +0100, antlists wrote in |
| 2 |
<f143bfa0-f0c9-c0da-d160-91183a41a4d3@××××××××××××.uk>: |
| 3 |
>I don't think an ISP is supposed to allocate less ... |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
I think your original message was open for multiple interpretations, |
| 6 |
or at least I read it as you saying there are 32 bit addresses the ISP |
| 7 |
allocates from. I now see the alternate one and the one you probably |
| 8 |
intended that there is 32 bits worth of /64's to hand out to |
| 9 |
customers. I'm sorry for misunderstanding at first. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Yes, a mimimum of /64 is what is recommended (and needed to make |
| 12 |
stateless auto configuration work on the customers end). Whether the |
| 13 |
/64 you get allocated is dynamic or static, can still depend on the |
| 14 |
ISP's practises and business model. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Cheers, |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Remco |
Archives