1 |
On 2 May 2009, at 09:39, Andrew Gaydenko wrote: |
2 |
>> ... |
3 |
>> Looks like an overheating GPU to me. |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> Do you have accelerated graphics on for those panels? |
6 |
>> I'll bet if you turn it off the problem will disappear. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Say, bottom panel hasn't something special: std menu, lancelot, |
9 |
> tasks, tray |
10 |
> and clock. Can overheating be such selectable? - I mean only KDE4 |
11 |
> panels- |
12 |
> related problem takes place (say, my sone plays few games without any |
13 |
> problems, as well as, say, OOo/Qt/KDE and so on emerging ). And I |
14 |
> didn't |
15 |
> overclocked something. But have added few additional silent coolers |
16 |
> inside a |
17 |
> case :-) |
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
Can overheating be so selective? I can't say for sure, but I can't see |
21 |
it having so much work to do when displaying the wallpaper as if those |
22 |
panels fade or slide. I presume they can be auto-hidden one way or the |
23 |
other when not in use, and that effects would be enabled by default if |
24 |
you have GPU acceleration available. |
25 |
|
26 |
Speckles are somewhat characteristic, and most any videogamer will |
27 |
recognise them - once you've had a graphics card or a Playstation |
28 |
(type) console die on you, they are very recognisable. |
29 |
|
30 |
The emerging won't have any effect on speckles, only GPU-related |
31 |
activity. It depends on the particular games that your son plays |
32 |
whether I'd say they're relevant. I'm no expert on Linux graphics (I |
33 |
don't use it on the desktop myself), but I'd guess TuxRacer probably |
34 |
does use the GPU whereas Frozen Bubble does not. |
35 |
|
36 |
If you're able to turn the GPU's acceleration features off in X11 (or |
37 |
the kernel?) and just treat it as a framebuffer device, then please |
38 |
prove me wrong! |
39 |
|
40 |
Stroller. |