| 1 |
Apparently, though unproven, at 15:56 on Friday 19 November 2010, James did |
| 2 |
opine thusly: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Any good recommendations on on the Internet |
| 5 |
> Traffic status? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> The net looks horrible here: |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> http://www.internettrafficreport.com/main.htm |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Yuck, that sux. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Down here at the tip of Africa, we didn't see anything unusual. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> I sure wish mirrorselect, was somehow more |
| 16 |
> dynamic, meaning the download could switch |
| 17 |
> mid-process, to another source, if there was |
| 18 |
> a 50% or so faster download link available. |
| 19 |
> You know some sort of state table maintained |
| 20 |
> on link speeds to my top 12 mirrors close to |
| 21 |
> my net (fastest throughputs). (urely I dream.....) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I hear Zac is very receptive to patches :-) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives