1 |
On Wednesday 25 May 2016 18:19:38 Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
2 |
> On 05/25/2016 06:09 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
3 |
> > Well, considering the importance of gummiboot to some of us, I might be |
4 |
> > willing to take it on - if I just knew a bit more about package |
5 |
> > maintenance. As I've said many times in recent years, my days of coding |
6 |
> > expired about 25 years ago, and then it was in very different systems |
7 |
> > from Linux. |
8 |
> These days it's a lot easier to get practice because you don't have to |
9 |
> deal with CVS. If you clone our git repo as your $PORTDIR, then you can |
10 |
> make your changes and `repoman commit` just like the rest of us. If |
11 |
> you're okay with Github, you can create pull requests there from that |
12 |
> same clone. |
13 |
|
14 |
Aye, there's the rub. Git is a closed book to me at the moment. Having to |
15 |
learn how to use it would at least triple my time to get up to speed. Time, |
16 |
I have plenty of (DV, as they say in religious circles), but my brain |
17 |
doesn't go nearly as well as it did 40 years ago. |
18 |
|
19 |
> You should probably read through the entire devmanual once, but there's |
20 |
> no substitute for practice and asking questions. |
21 |
|
22 |
Sounds like good advice - I'll go and find it now. |
23 |
|
24 |
> There are a lot of easy bugs open on bugs.gentoo.org that you could fix |
25 |
> to get experience. If you fix something in a maintainer-needed package |
26 |
> and post a pull request, I don't see why we couldn't just merge it. |
27 |
> You'll get good feedback that way. In fact, in the worst case, if |
28 |
> gummiboot drops to maintainer-needed, you could fix bugs and make |
29 |
> version bumps that way without the commitment of being the maintainer. |
30 |
|
31 |
Thanks for the encouragement. I'll muse awhile. |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
Rgds |
35 |
Peter |