| 1 |
On 11/1/19 2:00 PM, Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
> I think we came to the conclusion that one person is causing this. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
I don't agree with that conclusion. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> Basically his emails trigger the spam alarm and it gets marked before |
| 7 |
> or upon receipt by gmail. It doesn't even make it to my in box. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I don't know if spam is the proper term per say, but it's certainly in |
| 10 |
the email hygiene category. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> Now how a individual can find themselves in a place where their emails |
| 13 |
> are marked as spam like that, one can only guess. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I don't need to guess. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Any subscriber that posts to the list from an email domain that employs |
| 18 |
contemporary security; i.e. SPF, and DKIM, and DMARC, all with strict |
| 19 |
settings, will likely cause this to happen for subscribers that have |
| 20 |
email with a provider that honors said strict security. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> Thanks for the info. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
You're welcome. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Note: I expect this larger problem to get considerably worse (across |
| 27 |
mailing lists in general) before it gets better. Some governments |
| 28 |
around the world are mandating that any business that partners with the |
| 29 |
government in any way must implement the contemporary technologies that |
| 30 |
I'm talking about. Germany and the U.S.A. come to mind. I don't know |
| 31 |
of other examples off hand. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Grant. . . . |
| 37 |
unix || die |
Archives