Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is GWN dead?
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:06:15
Message-Id: 200801111546.03887.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Is GWN dead? by Dale
1 On Friday 11 January 2008, Dale wrote:
2 > Qian Qiao wrote:
3 > > I'm sorry this goes OT Dale, but unfortunately, my mail client
4 > > cannot render html messages properly, and I trust a lot of people
5 > > on the list have the same problem. If would be nice if you can post
6 > > in plain text, at least in this list.
7 > >
8 > > Thanks
9 >
10 > I have it set to send it text for this domain. Is it not sending in
11 > plain text? I have the same settings for other mailing lists as
12 > well.
13 >
14 > Thanks for pointing it out if it is not sending plain text tho.
15
16 It's sent multipart, so the pure text can be used alone for users like
17 Qian Qiao. That's how I've set up my kmail (I can view it as html if I
18 wish)
19
20 To be honest, it's not really a big deal for a list like this. The text
21 is 492 bytes, the html is 867 bytes and the whole thing is 4.5k
22
23 In other words, the text and html *together* are still smaller than the
24 headers :-)
25
26 --
27 Alan McKinnon
28 alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
29 --
30 gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Is GWN dead? Qian Qiao <qian.qiao@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] Is GWN dead? Dale <dalek1967@×××××××××.net>