Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Packages being Re-emerged after portage update
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:24:55
Message-Id: 20060821182036.25fc7926@krikkit.digimed.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Packages being Re-emerged after portage update by Willie Wong
1 On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:34:45 -0400, Willie Wong wrote:
2
3 > > Ebuild fixes and other general tidying up that do not alter the
4 > > installed code do not get a revision bump.
5 >
6 > Ah, thanks for the clarification. But wouldn't changing the USE
7 > variables change (pull in) dependencies and linked libraries? Or am I
8 > misunderstanding what is meant by installed code?
9
10 It looks like in this case, they are removing USE flags that are now
11 redundant, which wouldn't change the code. Adding compile features
12 certainly would.
13
14
15 --
16 Neil Bothwick
17
18 WinErr 103: Error buffer overflow - Too many errors encountered.
19 Additional errors may not be displayed or recorded.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Packages being Re-emerged after portage update Willie Wong <wwong@×××××××××.EDU>