| 1 |
Jason Weisberger wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I figure upgrading to GCC 4.1.1 from 3.4.5 wouldn't be such a pain, |
| 4 |
> right? WRONG. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Yes, very much so. See my "Upgrading to gcc 4.1: emerge -e world required?" |
| 7 |
thread. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> These packages quit on me after telling me that the reported filesize |
| 10 |
> by the ebuild wasn't equal to the downloaded filesize. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Were the errors correct? I mean, did the filesizes differ? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> I also had several packages quit on me |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
How? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> If these are the type of problems we're going to see with 4.1.1, I |
| 19 |
> would have to vote that it stay masked. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Yep. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> "Testing" isn't even the word |
| 24 |
> for this so far. I had to revert back to my 3.4.5 gcc and re-emerge |
| 25 |
> system after having too many errors to warrant continuing. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Hm. But there are people, who ran "emerge -e world" with gcc 4.1.1 |
| 28 |
and don't have problems. I suppose you'll only have problems, when |
| 29 |
you mix 3.x and 4.x. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Alexander Skwar |
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Fascinating, a totally parochial attitude. |
| 34 |
-- Spock, "Metamorphosis", stardate 3219.8 |
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives