1 |
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 00:52:41 +0200, lee wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> > You hold onto your issues with portage like they were some treasured |
4 |
> > memory of a long-since departed loved one, while all the time |
5 |
> > apparently ignoring the correct valid solutions offeered by kind |
6 |
> > folks on this list. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > Let it go. The devs know about portage output. I don't see you |
9 |
> > submitting patches though. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> You ran out of arguments |
12 |
|
13 |
This thread ran out of arguments a long time ago. Repeating the same ones |
14 |
doesn't count. |
15 |
|
16 |
> and remain at insisting that the problem is |
17 |
> known and cannot be fixed because it's too complicated |
18 |
|
19 |
It's not that it cannot be fixed, just that it is very difficult to do |
20 |
what you "just" want. |
21 |
|
22 |
> while rejecting |
23 |
> suggestions but asking for patches. So I have no reason to think that |
24 |
> patches would be any more welcome than suggestions, |
25 |
|
26 |
Patches are always more welcome than suggestions. "Fix it!" is never as |
27 |
welcome as "here's how". I think it was Canek who said "code talks". |
28 |
|
29 |
> and now even if you |
30 |
> came up with some pointer what to look at (since emerge, for example, is |
31 |
> a wrapper script from which I couldn't see where to start), |
32 |
|
33 |
Really? The first few lines of the script tell you where the real scripts |
34 |
are? The wrapper seems to be there to deal with different default |
35 |
Python versions. |
36 |
|
37 |
> I wouldn't waste my time with it. |
38 |
|
39 |
Then why on Earth would you expect the devs to do it for you with that |
40 |
attitude? Adding the word "just" to a demand does not make the task any |
41 |
simpler, nor does it increase your chances of getting what you want. On |
42 |
the contrary, it serves to illustrate that you do not grasp the |
43 |
complexity of the situation. |
44 |
|
45 |
|
46 |
-- |
47 |
Neil Bothwick |
48 |
|
49 |
Three kinds of people: those who can count and those who can't. |