On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 09:36:47PM -0800, Aaron Shi wrote:
Aaron, could you please subscribe to the firstname.lastname@example.org mailinglist
(email@example.com) and continue all website
redesign-related dicussions there? As you see we have some quite active
people working on things, and having me playing relay host is a waste of
> Hi Sven,
> Happy new year!
> The hard disk migration was fine, but a faulty wall socket at home fried my
> mainboard and the computer shop that I go to didn't open until a few days
> after the new year. All is well now, but I did have a lot of catch up to do
> as far as work and school goes since they both rely on the computer.
> Anyhow, the stuff that Michael was basing his work on was the really old
> stuff from last November. I had it practically redone during December, but
> haven't had a chance to upload it. I'm sorry I wasn't able to do it sooner.
> He must've played around with something that broke the layout in IE 6...some
> elements on the page moves if you mouseover links on the navigation bar.
> The old stuff did have minor IE problems which were hackfixed in the
> November version, so it's not surprising that changes could throw things
> off. The new stuff that I uploaded today should be more robust and it
> should provide a good base for expansions. =)
> I like what Michael's doing, but I'm a bit worried about a few things that
> he's doing. Namely, things like changing CSS classes/ids from what make
> logical sense to something that doesn't, e.g. the news wrapper div #news to
> #main. The #news wrapper only applies to the What's New section on the home
> page for the purpose of selecting elements within and organization. It will
> not be used on other pages as the tables, links, etc. in the What's New
> section is rather special, and selecting and applying style rules to these
> elements on content pages would not make any sense. Another thing was using
> a span and a CSS rule to make text italic, but(X)HTML already has such a tag
> for the exact purpose: <em>.
> Other than that, he's doing a good job. I like how he centered the jump
> pads and used justify for the text (which has quirks when you try to print,
> but very negligible). I have included these improvements into the version I
> uploaded tonight. ;) I also want to say that it will be a good idea to
> limit the number of news items on the home page to two if they have
> summaries as long as the current ones. It will make for a faster load time
> and less clutter. It is also not necessary to have old news on the home
> page. If we decide to have a long page of new items, the jump pads will be
> almost useless as they will be many screens down the page.
> Besides streamlining the code and fixing IE quirks, there are also several
> other major improvements.
> The CSS is now cascaded: global level (i.e. www/packages/bugs/forums, etc.)
> -> site level (i.e. www.gentoo.org) -> page level (i.e. homepage of
> www.gentoo.org). This should make modifications much easier during
> development and onwards, as it will obvious where rules are located and most
> changes should probably only be made on the site/page level.
> I also made a prototype print CSS for the content pages, you can see what it
> looks like by going to the generic page in your browser and going to print
> To address the issue of font sizes, I've implemented a font size changer on
> the content pages. The user could increase/decrease the content font size
> and the changes are saved into a cookie so that it will apply site wide. I
> think this give users flexibility without compromising the layout of the
> pages. Without this system, the user would use his browser to increase font
> size. The browser would increase all the fonts...making the navigation bar
> (and other) fonts extremely out of proporation, causing it to wrap in the
> lower bound "designed for" resolution of 800x600. Text is still defined
> using relative sizes, so the user still has the option of using his browser
> sizes. =p
> I am unable to test any of this on Konqueror as my linux drive is currently
> sitting outside the computer waiting for a usb case. :( They work perfectly
> in IE6, Firefox and Opera though.
> > about-v1 but without the search box. Chances are we won't have search
> functionality anyway.
> Why not? It's easily implemented with Google. It practically indexes like
> 200,000 pages from all the gentoo.org sites already anyway. Google offers
> an ad free, customizable search solution for 501.c.3 non-profit
> organizations. http://services.google.com/publicservice/login
> Even in the worst case, we can always tap into Google by restricting queries
> to site:gentoo.org or whatever. I use that for the current Gentoo
> site...some search is better than no search and I find what I need much
> Btw, how the dev process going? I haven't heard from anyone since sending
> in my info/keys last year.
> I realize this is a rather long email, so I'm cutting it here. ;)
> The links are:
> Home: http://www.aaronshi.com/gentoo/index.html
> A generic content page (handbook in this case):