Archives
Archives
| From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ACCEPT_RESTRICT for questionable values of RESTRICT | ||
| Date: | Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:04:20 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200701101400.50473.vapier@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ACCEPT_RESTRICT for questionable values of RESTRICT by Jakub Moc |
||
| 1 | On Wednesday 10 January 2007 13:45, Jakub Moc wrote: |
| 2 | > Real solution, sure... RESTRICT=sandbox is not a solution, it's |
| 3 | > identical to the current hackish workaround, so I guess we can save |
| 4 | > portage folks the trouble... |
| 5 | |
| 6 | except that RESTRICT is the documented method for disabling user FEATURES in |
| 7 | ebuilds ... it works for pretty much every FEATURE except some |
| 8 | -mike |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ACCEPT_RESTRICT for questionable values of RESTRICT | Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ACCEPT_RESTRICT for questionable values of RESTRICT | Marius Mauch <genone@g.o> |