| 1 |
Paul Varner wrote: |
| 2 |
> My gut reaction to reading this proposal was no! While I can see a need |
| 3 |
> for reducing the number of people involved with a complaint, I firmly |
| 4 |
> feel that in order to ensure fairness in the complaint process that |
| 5 |
> there needs to be checks and balances in place. The recent changes to |
| 6 |
> split the investigative from the judical side of developer relations and |
| 7 |
> make everything transparent as possible does much to accomplish this. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I strongly feel that moving back to a small committee would be a step |
| 10 |
> backwards in that respect. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Why can't a small committee be fair? Where are the checks and balances |
| 13 |
in the "new" structure? I see one group investigating, another deciding |
| 14 |
the punishment, but no insurance that the latter group won't go |
| 15 |
overboard with punishment or give people a slap on the wrist for a major |
| 16 |
problem. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I agree that transparency is a good thing, but I disagree that |
| 19 |
increasing the bureaucracy does much besides increase the time necessary |
| 20 |
to get anything done. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Thanks, |
| 23 |
Donnie |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-devrel@g.o mailing list |
Archives