| 1 |
Donnie Berkholz schrieb: |
| 2 |
> Funny how every time a controversial decision gets made, somebody |
| 3 |
> inevitably tries to undermine the authority of the group making the |
| 4 |
> decision. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> In my understanding, the issue you want to address is whether the |
| 7 |
> QA team has authority over tree policy. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Will add to the agenda. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Thanks, I would like to phrase the question a little more precisely: |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I would like to ask council to state whether the QA team has the |
| 14 |
authority to mandate a policy when there is neither general agreement |
| 15 |
that this policy is a good thing, nor the policy would avert any kind |
| 16 |
of immediate serious problem for users. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> I happen to disagree. GLEP 48's point about maintaining "QA |
| 19 |
> Standards" applies to this. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
"QA Standards" are not really defined in GLEP 48 either. Maybe council |
| 22 |
could also clarify whether "QA Standard" is just another name for |
| 23 |
"tree policy". |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Best regards, |
| 27 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Archives