| 1 |
Petteri Räty demis ki:: |
| 2 |
> Michael Hammer wrote: |
| 3 |
>> * Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o> [081112 00:46]: |
| 4 |
>>> What are others feelings on this? |
| 5 |
>> I like the idea! |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>>> What issues do you see with having a wiki? |
| 8 |
>> Pages of poor quality with wrong informations. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>>> Do you see anyway to resolve the issue you see with us having a |
| 11 |
>>> wiki? |
| 12 |
>> We should develop some kind of review process and at least the |
| 13 |
>> possiblity to lock and hide pages of poor quality. In the most cases |
| 14 |
>> the howtos are related to some herds. What if we have a "reviewed |
| 15 |
>> section" where herds can approve pages and user can be sure that the |
| 16 |
>> infos provided have a minimum of quality. |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> g, mueli |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> We already have a reviewed section. It's called GDP. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Regards, |
| 24 |
> Petteri |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
The wiki can be a staging ground for user contributed documents, which can |
| 28 |
become part of official docs after a review and cleanup by developers. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Gokdeniz Karadag |
Archives