1 |
On 01/01/13 23:01, Jeff Horelick wrote: |
2 |
> I would like to propose a switch of the order of DEPENDs in |
3 |
> virtual/pkgconfig to make dev-util/pkgconf[pkg-config] the default |
4 |
> choice for new installations. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> dev-util/pkgconf has less external dependencies, is lighter and is |
7 |
> faster than dev-util/pkgconfig while being now 100% compatible |
8 |
> |
9 |
> This switch has already been made by Funtoo, Alpine Linux and FreeBSD |
10 |
> with very little in the way of ill effects recently from any of those |
11 |
> 3 camps. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> There are no more pending bugs against pkgconf (and Diego did a |
14 |
> tinderbox run with it a while back) in Gentoo. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> pkgconf also has a upstream that is more than happy to work with us |
17 |
> specifically (or anyone for that matter) and I (a Gentoo developer) am |
18 |
> one of the upstream developers. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> If this is approved, I will make the change in ~2 weeks. I'm not |
21 |
> planning on making a news item because users should notice little |
22 |
> difference. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Thanks |
25 |
> Jeff |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
i'd say never. there is no benefit in switching. pkg-config is the |
29 |
default implementation from freedesktop.org. |
30 |
pkg-config is now lighter and has less dependencies than before as the |
31 |
switch from bundled glib1 to glib2 allowed dropping of the popt library. |
32 |
|
33 |
and since pkgconf upstream doesn't properly follow pkg-config upstream |
34 |
git and do necessary changes, like for bug 445796 it would mean |
35 |
pkg-config related bugs would have to be reported to double upstream and |
36 |
thus, not be maintainable |
37 |
|
38 |
last I checked prefix didn't have issues with the pkg-config bootstrap |
39 |
either. there is no circular deps either. |
40 |
|
41 |
lose-lose situation for the switch, so over my commit access ;-) |