From: | Alin Nastac <mrness@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] cleaning out 'bc' and 'ed' from system | ||
Date: | Fri, 22 Apr 2005 07:09:59 | ||
Message-Id: | 4268A33F.9070704@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] cleaning out 'bc' and 'ed' from system by Philip Webb |
1 | Philip Webb wrote: |
2 | |
3 | >Ed is there because it's needed for Sed, which is useful for sysadmin; |
4 | >Bc has a similar usefulness. all at basic console level. |
5 | > |
6 | > |
7 | sed does not depend on ed, nor does the ed depend on sed. |
8 | sed should remain in system since tons of ebuild heavily depends on it. |
9 | |
10 | when was the last time you used ed? it is a completely useless editor, |
11 | peeps use vim instead. |
12 | anyway, who says you cannot install ed if you want it so bad? |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] cleaning out 'bc' and 'ed' from system | Spider <spider@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] cleaning out 'bc' and 'ed' from system | Luke Ravitch <luke@××××××××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] cleaning out 'bc' and 'ed' from system | Anthony de Boer <gentoo-dev@××××××××××××××.net> |