Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alin Nastac <mrness@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] cleaning out 'bc' and 'ed' from system
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 07:09:59
Message-Id: 4268A33F.9070704@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] cleaning out 'bc' and 'ed' from system by Philip Webb
1 Philip Webb wrote:
2
3 >Ed is there because it's needed for Sed, which is useful for sysadmin;
4 >Bc has a similar usefulness. all at basic console level.
5 >
6 >
7 sed does not depend on ed, nor does the ed depend on sed.
8 sed should remain in system since tons of ebuild heavily depends on it.
9
10 when was the last time you used ed? it is a completely useless editor,
11 peeps use vim instead.
12 anyway, who says you cannot install ed if you want it so bad?

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] cleaning out 'bc' and 'ed' from system Spider <spider@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] cleaning out 'bc' and 'ed' from system Luke Ravitch <luke@××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] cleaning out 'bc' and 'ed' from system Anthony de Boer <gentoo-dev@××××××××××××××.net>