Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Official overlay support
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:24:51
Message-Id: 1143123468.14434.5.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Official overlay support by Stuart Herbert
1 On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 22:03 +0000, Stuart Herbert wrote:
2 > To answer Daniel's other question, about bugs.g.o ... trac on
3 > overlays.g.o will have its bug tracking system disabled. We already
4 > have one bug tracking system - bugs.g.o - and that's sufficient.
5
6 Umm... no?
7
8 If some random developer goes out there and creates his own fork of
9 catalyst in his overlay, I sure don't want to receive a *single* bug on
10 it. Ever.
11
12 If you're already using Trac, you should keep the bug tracking enabled,
13 so the bugs stay with the overlay. Once something moves into the
14 official tree, then it can use bugs.gentoo.org for its bug tracking.
15 This means developers that don't wish to participate in the overlays are
16 not forced to waste their time troubleshooting problems in these
17 overlays and can focus on our *core* product, the portage tree.
18
19 I have no problem with someone, for example, making their own fork of
20 catalyst for testing new stuff and then, after extensive testing,
21 submitting it "upstream" to the official repository, but forcing me to
22 waste my time trying to figure out that some random developer out there
23 has made a fork that does something different from the official version
24 when a user has a bug is completely counter-productive.
25
26 --
27 Chris Gianelloni
28 Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
29 x86 Architecture Team
30 Games - Developer
31 Gentoo Linux

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Official overlay support Stuart Herbert <stuart.herbert@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Official overlay support Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>