1 |
On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 10:11:51 -0500 |
2 |
R0b0t1 <r030t1@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Then I'm quite confused as to why people seem to be extremely attentive to |
5 |
> copyright infringement (besides an immediate payout). In the US they cite |
6 |
> the reasoning I gave, from memory. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Maybe that was for trademarks? |
9 |
|
10 |
This is one of those problems where the nebulous term "IP" has infected |
11 |
our thinking. |
12 |
|
13 |
Yes, US is very *copyright* infringement zealous. |
14 |
|
15 |
But Trademark and Copyright are very different beasts. |
16 |
|
17 |
Trademarks (read: brands, company names, company symbols, etc) do |
18 |
expire much shorter, but that's due to other reasons. Namely, that if |
19 |
your company ceases to be doing business for 10 years, nobody is harmed |
20 |
by people using a name of a company that doesn't exist, because |
21 |
"Trademark protection" is largely a device to prevent competitors |
22 |
claiming they're you, and to prevent competitors selling products |
23 |
claiming you made them. |
24 |
|
25 |
Copyright (read: the right to publish, distribute, and sell) has a much |
26 |
longer life as the results of that can be inheritable, eg: profits from |
27 |
sale copyrighted works can go towards the estate of the author of those |
28 |
works after the death of that author. |
29 |
|
30 |
There are documented *exceptions* to this, but they don't apply to us |
31 |
as they apply to public institutions such as archives and libraries. |
32 |
|
33 |
And there are exceptions in cases of "fair use", which Gentoo does not |
34 |
fall under. |
35 |
|
36 |
So, even though it is true that copyright expires, copy right expiry |
37 |
dates are currently such that most juristictions don't have any |
38 |
software that could conceivably exist that expires. |
39 |
|
40 |
If the expiry period is 50 years, and there's no software in |
41 |
circulation older than 30, its kindof a moot point to argue software |
42 |
that is less than 10 years old might have expired. |
43 |
|
44 |
> >> Sir, please see my above comment about building ballistic missiles. |
45 |
> >> It may be important for the Gentoo Foundation to add a disclaimer |
46 |
> >> similar to the one I mentioned. I would hate for the Foundation or |
47 |
> >> any of its administrators or contributors to be found guilty of |
48 |
> >> aiding and abetting terrorists. |
49 |
> > |
50 |
> > Yeah. Stop trolling, please. |
51 |
> > |
52 |
> |
53 |
> I am being completely serious. You can find such a clause in the iTunes |
54 |
> license. |
55 |
> |
56 |
> If it seems ridiculous please reconsider the subject in question. |
57 |
|
58 |
I'm not sure how enforceable that clause is as a License. |
59 |
|
60 |
As a Warranty, sure. |
61 |
|
62 |
"if you use it for this, don't blame us if bad things happen, we told |
63 |
you not to" |
64 |
|
65 |
Also, those are typically things that fall under "National Laws" and it |
66 |
doesn't really make sense to have to explicitly articulate in a |
67 |
software license that its intended use is to be done within the scope |
68 |
of your local governing laws. |
69 |
|
70 |
You're bound to follow local law regardless of whether you accept or |
71 |
reject a given license. So, its kinda moot. |
72 |
|
73 |
If your government goes and uses your software for military |
74 |
applications despite your license saying "don't", I'm not really sure |
75 |
you'll have much in the way of recourse. |
76 |
|
77 |
If it was that simple I'd just start putting license terms that |
78 |
prohibits people from using software I wrote as part of a state |
79 |
approved mass surveillance platform.... |