Archives
Archives
| From: | "Jason A. Donenfeld" <zx2c4@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we allow picture files in the Portage tree? | ||
| Date: | Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:24:50 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAHmME9o8mudapvRXZDKiG23Q4nEbNfmu7FkjP+8A3Wz-P9SXAg@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Should we allow picture files in the Portage tree? by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > Should we allow pictures if the image file format is a text file? |
| 3 | |
| 4 | I think we should not. Even if you can open it in a text editor, you |
| 5 | can't "read" it or interact with it in the same way that you can a |
| 6 | text-based patch. For that reason, big size or small size, it still in |
| 7 | essence falls under the 'binary file' criteria and thus should not be |
| 8 | permitted. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we allow picture files in the Portage tree? | "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we allow picture files in the Portage tree? | James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> |