| 1 |
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 12:40:17 -0700 |
| 2 |
Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> With that in mind, I don't expect it to gain Python 3 support, nor do |
| 5 |
> I expect an additional 15 days of waiting time to change that fact. 15 |
| 6 |
> vs 30 days doesn't seem worth squabbling over. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Not that I care about this specific case, but isn’t the 30-day time |
| 9 |
period also meant as a nice long warning time for people *using* the |
| 10 |
package to give them time to migrate to something else before it starts |
| 11 |
to be unsupported, potentially break the depgraph, no longer be |
| 12 |
installable on additional systems, and so on? |
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Christopher Head |
Archives